2026-08-31
User:
You are a canon-consistency lens for a novel draft. Facts only — no style or voice comments, and never propose cutting a reason, an explanation, an answer or a qualification.
Read, in full (rulings accumulate dated at the bottom of files, so read whole files):
- redacted/draft/book-01/scenes/38-twelve-stakes.md (the scene under check — a fresh draft)
- redacted/draft/book-01/scenes/36-write-both.md and 37-what-would-have-to-be-true.md (the scenes around it — 38 is the afternoon/evening of the same day as 37's morning refusal)
- redacted/notes/canon/characters/minor.md (Tess, Burl, the alehouse keeper and his brother-in-law), mattie-ordish.md, peri.md, edwin.md
- redacted/notes/canon/world/silent-soil.md (the stake protocol as practised), timeline.md
- redacted/draft/book-01/SCENES.md (the binding lists — note the improbability-engine rules: one small move this act, scene 38, the oak already cut, on Edwin's own chore and time only, never on evidence, and Edwin does NOT name it aloud here)
Read ONLY the files listed above. Do not open, search, glob or grep any other directory or file; do not use grep or find at all.
redacted sentence: unpublished prose redacted sentence: unpublished prose
Report as a list of findings only: quoted line, the conflicting fact (file and quote), and a minimal replacement preserving the sentence's reason. If a fact is merely uncited but not contradicted, say "uncontradicted, uncited" and move on. No praise. Your final message is the report.
🔧 Read draft/book-01/scenes/38-twelve-stakes.md
✅ 42 lines, 5921 chars
🔧 Read draft/book-01/scenes/36-write-both.md
✅ 54 lines, 7532 chars
🔧 Read draft/book-01/scenes/37-what-would-have-to-be-true.md
✅ 42 lines, 6087 chars
🔧 Read notes/canon/characters/minor.md
✅ 628 lines, 40049 chars
🔧 Read notes/canon/characters/mattie-ordish.md
✅ 478 lines, 29243 chars
🔧 Read notes/canon/characters/peri.md
🔧 Read notes/canon/characters/edwin.md
✅ 972 lines, 64776 chars
✅ 975 lines, 64406 chars
🔧 Read notes/canon/world/silent-soil.md
✅ 670 lines, 42638 chars
🔧 Read notes/canon/timeline.md
✅ 1 lines, 96 chars
🔧 Read draft/book-01/SCENES.md
✅ 216 lines, 18952 chars
FINDINGS
"K, L and M went into the barn instead, cut, lettered, dated, and laid dry across two beams" ... "K, L, M: made and waiting. The edge they mark isn't ours to stand a stake in."
redacted sentence: unpublished prose The scene's single blanket reason ("isn't ours to stand a stake in") is true of L and M but not of K.
Minimal replacement preserving the reason: split the log line, e.g. "K: made and waiting, for our own headland. L, M: made and waiting. The edge they mark isn't ours to stand a stake in yet."
"I said the stump had moved, in Seedmonth, when it was the reading that was wrong, and Mother wrote ask if stump moved in the book instead of laughing at me."
redacted sentence: unpublished prose The scene has Tess say her mother wrote it.
Minimal replacement preserving the reason: "...and I wrote 'ask if stump moved' in the book myself instead of feeling foolish about it." (or otherwise attribute the note to Tess rather than Mattie).
"So there's no I in any series of mine, and no O either, for the same reason, if a series ever runs that long."
The O-omission is not present in any canon file (silent-soil.md and minor.md both give only "I omitted"). Not contradicted, but new — flag for author confirmation rather than treat as established.
"Will they be here in ten years? ... You'll be five and twenty when somebody paces these for the hundred and twentieth time" — arithmetic check: Tess is 15 (minor.md, mattie-ordish.md), 25 − 15 = 10 years, 10 years × 12 monthly pacings = 120th pacing. redacted sentence: unpublished prose
"and each one logged before the next was begun: its letter, the hour, and its chained distance to two fixed things that would outlive everybody present — the gatepost or the thorn stump, the water trough or the ditch willow" — matches silent-soil.md's stake protocol exactly. Uncontradicted.
redacted sentence: unpublished prose
Charring the stake points for preservation — uncontradicted, uncited (no canon statement either way; real-world practice, plausible).
The brother-in-law already knowing the errand ("the alehouse being faster than any post") — mundane, not the engine (SCENES.md H1 reserves the engine for Edwin's own frictions, never the post/who-answers); consistent with that rule. No character names the luck aloud; "an errand that went easier than errands go" and "within an inch of the thickness Edwin would have named" are narration only, unremarked by any character — satisfies SCENES.md's engine constraints (one small move, on Edwin's own chore/time, not named aloud in this scene).
Timing: Scene 38 (Day 11 evening) has Sennet's leave to dig still pending — consistent with scene 37 (his "No" that morning, the evening "what would have to be true" question, and his yes arriving only at dawn Day 12). The K/L/M-in-barn state as of Day 11 evening does not contradict silent-soil.md's later note that L and M are driven "the next morning" (Day 12) — but see finding 1 for the reason given being wrong for K specifically.
redacted sentence: unpublished prose
No forbidden names, no harm/safety claims, no resolution of sealed silent-soil questions in this scene.