Project [redacted]. Read notes/sealed/destiny.md fully (the current,…

Now the clue ledger entry, the fair-play objection update, and the verification record.

It's a paragraph, not a separate bullet. Let me fix the edit accordingly.

Now mirror (1) into magic-constraints.md's Seal section as a row.

Now commit.

Done. Committed as 2939700.

Shape of the edit:

• destiny.md §7a — added a new paragraph ruling the second failure mode. It fitted the existing mechanism without needing any new machinery: it follows directly from the working's established inability to interpret/judge a demand (§1–2), just applied to a different missing ingredient than the one-binding case. No amendment to the mechanism itself was needed, only an articulation of a case it already implied.
  redacted sentence
• Objection C2 (fair-play craft objection) — the weaker "stated-rule fairness" grade is now explicitly superseded: since the reader watches a Seal-cast fail on the page before Book 5, fairness moves to a demonstrated grade. Old reasoning kept in place (not deleted) with a note explaining why it's superseded rather than wrong. The earlier "decision wanted" (whether to authorise a second binder for demonstration) is marked answered — and answered in the negative, since the new failure mode does the demonstrating without needing a second binder.
  redacted sentence
• magic-constraints.md — added one new row under the Seal section mirroring the §7a addition, with binding strength and citation.

Nothing here required overruling or weakening any existing constraint — the two failure modes (already-bound vs. impossible-demand) are deliberately kept indistinguishable to characters in the story, which was already the sealed file's operating discipline for ambiguous mechanism reveals, so no new guard rule was needed beyond stating that explicitly.

No open decision remains for you here — everything requested was a ruling to record, not a choice to make. redacted sentence