You are running the `consistency-check` skill on four newly drafted s…

← back to session · subagent transcript, not indexed

2026-08-30

User:

You are running the consistency-check skill on four newly drafted scenes of Book 1 of "Autoroad" (a LitRPG novel repo at redacted). Do NOT read anything under notes/sealed/.

Target scenes (read these in full):

Ground truth to read FIRST, in full:

Also read for continuity context only (NOT under review, do not report findings on these directly unless the new scenes contradict something stated in them):

What to check in the four target scenes

  1. Hard contradictions with Established or Working canon — quote the canon line (with file), quote the scene line (with file+location), give the minimal fix.
  2. Deferred questions the scenes resolve casually — check each entry in deferred-questions.md's table against what the scenes say; note the entry's named trigger and whether these scenes constitute that trigger or a premature resolution.
  3. redacted sentence: unpublished prose Check all date/day-count references in the four scenes for arithmetic consistency with each other, with timeline.md, and with scenes 34-42.
  4. Names, sums, distances, roster counts that don't add up — within the four scenes themselves, and against canon (character names/spellings, ages — especially checking for any stray "21/three years" shed-age figures that should now read nineteen/second-year per the override — headcounts, money sums, travel distances/times).
  5. New facts the four scenes establish that canon does not yet record — list as backfill candidates for the separate consistency-backfill skill (do not edit canon files yourself).

Output format

A numbered findings list, most severe first, using the categories above. For each finding: quote scene line + location, quote/cite conflicting canon or note absence, classify as contradiction / drift / ambiguity / backfill-candidate, suggest minimal fix. Be terse — no praise, no throat-clearing. If a category has no findings, say so plainly. Do not edit any files — this is a read-only check. Report your full findings list as your final answer.

🔧 Skill:

✅ 1 lines, 34 chars

🔧 Agent: Consistency check four draft scenes

✅ 6 lines, 1067 chars

The consistency check is running in the background as a subagent. I'll report the findings as soon as it completes.

⚙ background task finished — Agent "Consistency check four draft scenes" finished

Consistency Check — Scenes 43–46

Overview: All four scenes are tightly sourced to canon. All chain-figure arithmetic, dates, mileage, headcounts, and dialogue reuse were verified. No hard contradictions found.

Contradiction

None found. Verified exact matches against canon: chain readings (6ch20→6ch18; 9ch50/48→9ch73), dates (28/29 Cornmonth), Holm Deep interval math (82 days = "eleven weeks and five days"), mileage (Fenholt–Ashway = 32 miles), scene 45 unpublished redacted sentence: unpublished prose

Deferred question resolved casually

None found. Scene 43 unpublished redacted sentence: unpublished prose No god, holiday, realm, or Edwin class-name named; no lifespan guarantee stated.

Day/date/calendar errors

None found. Scene 42 unpublished = Day 13 (27 Cornmonth); scene 43 unpublished = Days 14–15 (28–29 Cornmonth); scenes 44–46 = Day 15 (29 Cornmonth). Internal arithmetic checks out throughout.

Names, sums, distances, headcounts

None found in error.

Backfill candidates (for consistency-backfill)

  1. Scene 43 unpublished — labour division on the chain rerun: Burl holds the post end, Tess writes, Peri walks the line inspecting ground.
  2. Scene 45 unpublishedredacted redacted sentence: unpublished prose
  3. Scene 46 unpublishedredacted redacted sentence: unpublished prose
  4. Scene 44 unpublished — the Charter-house slate as a weekly public log (dates 14th/21st/28th Cornmonth) distinct from redacted's private leakage book, with the deduction "somebody walks somewhere on the same day of the week."
  5. Scene 45 unpublished redacted sentence: unpublished prose

Drift / ambiguity

  1. plans/book-01/clue-ledger.md unpublished is keyed to an old scene-numbering scheme (rewrite/book-01/arc-0N/scenes/, chapters 037–054) that doesn't map to the current draft/book-01/scenes/ numbering — it can't currently verify clue-budget compliance for scenes 43–46. Housekeeping gap, not a content error.
  2. draft/book-01/SCENES.md's Act 2 binding note says "redacted's people sealed... clue 1 twice (44, 69)" implying a grandmother's-people clue should land in scene 44 unpublished, but the drafted scene 44 unpublished ("Where they stopped writing") contains only the Charter-board reading, no such clue. Either the binding note's scene number is stale or a planned clue was dropped — flag for confirmation before assembly, not a canon contradiction.

Relevant paths: draft/book-01/scenes/43-two-lines-one-field.md unpublished, 44-where-they-stopped-writing.md unpublished redacted sentence: unpublished prose unpublished, 46-a-list-of-houses.md unpublished redacted sentence: unpublished prose unpublished draft/book-01/SCENES.md.